Reaction to Brenda Sherry's "Teddy Bears Go Blogging"

Brenda Sherry's article reads like a how-to essay for gradually incorporating blogging into the classroom.  The Teddy Bear Project was the vehicle for a transition from private publishing in e-mails to public publishing in blogs, about which classmates, pen pals, teachers, and parents can comment.  The key for me will be to create a similar vehicle, a comparable overarching project that motivates students to blog and to participate in a writing community. 

One vehicle that is already in place at my school is Project Amigo, a project that connects our students with Mexican students via Skype conversations.  Both parties practice their primary and secondary languages, moving back and forth between Spanish and English with the guidance of teachers.  An important objective in the language arts curriculum is to teach students to understand the difference between spoken and written language and to "speak and write using standard language structures and diction appropriate to audience and task" (Standard 4.3).  Blogging may be a way to augment Project Amigo with a written component.  Video chats engender fellowship and provide a simulated immersion experience--putting a face with the name, socializing informally, working on accents--but blogging and commenting between the schools allows students to write purposefully and conscientiously in Spanish and English.  Students will also have time to deconstruct/translate text and to craft responses.  Overcoming the language barrier will give students added motivation to follow conventions and employ appropriate grammatical constructions and vocabulary.  This is something I might pursue, especially because the partnership is already in place.

Sherry's most important point is that the "focus was on the communication, rather than the technology."  She emphasizes here that blogging technology is nearly foolproof once in place.  The teacher must oversee action like a webmaster, but the paperless concreteness of the Web and the user-friendly, do-it-from-anywhere editing features (certainly more user-friendly than files and files of word documents moving within networks and flash drives) take the onus off the teacher and put "control in the hands of the learners."  The learner must consider the essential questions about communication rather than the trivial questions about formatting, printing, saving, and e-mail.  They consider: (1) What do I want to say? (2) To whom do I want to say it? (3) How do I want to say it? (4) How will I use comments to my/our advantage?  (5) When and how will I revise what I say? 

Hopefully students will realize the importance of writing as a reader, as a critical audience member who will judge postings based on content as well as appearance, on ideas as well as conventionality, on message as well as form.  How will I present myself so as to be taken seriously by a general audience?  Who or what should I consult if I have questions about my communication?  The blogosphere is conducive to asking and answering these questions in an authentic and healthy way: to write as readers with the audience always in mind.


Because editing previous posts is so easy, integrating suggestions from comments or proofreading after learning a new convention in a mini-lesson becomes almost fun.  I suspect it must feel like turning back the clock.  "Thanks for pointing out opportunities for improvements," says the blogger when he edits a posting.  Or at least the thick-skinned blogger will.  I fear that a blogging community could crumble under the weight of a crass or insensitive comment.  That is why I was so relieved by Sherry's explanation of how she managed this risk: "I then enabled the comment moderation button, which meant that I received an e-mail copy and the option to publish or reject the comment.  This was a good way for me to screen the content for appropriateness and to make sure that Internet safety was a priority."  The comment moderation feature is perfect and allows the teacher to be the final firewall against the destruction of a a blogging community through unneeded controversy. 

I don't know if teddy bears will go blogging in my school, but I know students will.

Curriculum Standard Focus and Addressing Different Learning Styles

Of the four standards in the CT language arts framework, I chose Standard 3 as my focus for the semester, described in the Connecticut PK-8 English Language Arts Curriculum Standards official document (found here--CSDE Literacy/English Language Arts Publications) as such:

"Standard 3: Communicating with Others
Overarching Idea: Students produce written, oral, and visual texts to express, develop and substantiate ideas and experiences.
Guiding Question: How do we write, speak and present effectively?
Component Statements:
3.1 Students use descriptive, narrative, expository, persuasive and poetic modes.
3.2 Students prepare, publish, and /or present work appropriate to audience, purpose and task" (100).

Essentially, this is the writing standard, while Standards 1 and 2 focus on reading and Standard 4 addresses language conventions (usage, grammar, and mechanics) and Standard American English (switching from the vernacular as a appropriate).

What is remarkable about this writing standard is its flexibility.  Doubtless, traditional pen-on-paper writing is the understood priority; however, the standard is written to accommodate all "appropriate" modes of communication.  The most "effective" means of communication should prevail over the merely traditional means.  Therefore, the five-paragraph essay--complete with inverted introductory triangle, "first, second, and third," and constant repetition of the thesis--should not take precedent over a digital story unless the essay is more "appropriate to audience, purpose and task."  "May the best means of communication win," implies the standard.

Proudly viewing oneself as literate, identifying oneself as another reader and writer in a global community of readers and writers, is as important for a student as performing the actual tasks that demonstrate literacy proficiency.  Storytelling is pivotal in a student's self-identification as literate for pleasure and enrichment.  My focus this semester will be providing outlets for students to find their voices.  I will not link activities for different learning styles to this standard for the sake of the storyteller alone, but for the sake of audience, purpose, and task.  In other words, I will not encourage Jimmy to journal solely because he is an intrapersonal learner and a journal entry is the most comfortable way for him to express himself, but because keeping a journal is the most appropriate mode of communication for effectively fulfilling a purpose, reaching an audience, or performing a task.  Below are examples of learning activities for multiple intelligences that meet Standard 3:

• kinesthetic learners may write the screenplay for and act in a silent film, consisting of detailed, descriptive stage directions and concise on-screen text (for the intermittent explanatory writing between and during scenes), or they can read and deconstruct, then imitate published plays
• auditory learners may listen to audio books, then imitate the form with their own audio books, or create a series of podcasts
• visual/artistic learners may create comic books or digital stories
• verbal learners may write letters to the editor or keep a blog that showcases the best work in their portfolio
• interpersonal learners may conduct filmed or recorded interviews
• naturalistic learners may photograph nature and write poetic descriptive pieces or write persuasive letters to public officials about an issue that concerns them, e.g. climate change, air pollution, etc.
• intrapersonal learners may compose multimedia memoirs or keep a learning blog, which (unlike a confessional public diary) allows them to reflect on their learning (comprehension, confusion, further questioning, follow-up research, etc.)
• musical learners may compose song lyrics and raps or take responsibility for soundtrack music in a collaborative digital story or short film and write an accompanying piece that explains the rationale behind the music selections

For all above learning activities, there should be an authentic, high-stakes audience (beyond classmates and teacher) and a motivational purpose (to inspire, to reform, to entertain, etc.).  I look forward to exploring the connections between educational technology, multiple intelligences, and Standard 3 (communicating with others).